At a recent family dinner, a few members of my family were drinking their usual “Vodka with a splash of cranberry.” As with most families, having a drink or two at a dinner is a common occurrence in my family. However, there has never been a more dangerous time in Massachusetts to have a few drinks and then go behind the wheel of a motor vehicle.
For example, on April 22, 2011, a young girl lost of her life due to the alleged drunk-driving of her friend. And of course, there has never been a year where more State Troopers were hit and injured by the actions of alleged drunk drivers. So the questions remains, what if you are pulled over after having a drink? What do you do? Do you take the Field Sobriety Tests?
Under the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, Article 12, all citizens of the Commonwealth have the right to refuse a police officer’s request to submit to Field Sobriety Tests. Further, said refusal is inadmissible at trial. However, if you refuse to submit to the Field Sobriety Tests you will almost certainly be placed under arrest and charged with Operating Under the Influence. So the question remains, what are the pros and cons of submitting to a field sobriety test?
In the first instance, we should all be acutely aware that when someone is pulled over after a drink or two there is nothing more nerve-racking. Our reactions will not be the same. Our decision-making ability might be altered, and quite frankly, we may not do things the way we would normally do. The very first thing one must do is gain their composure and make sound and logical decisions. Take a deep breath, and quickly obtain your driver’s license and registration — even before the police officer approaches the vehicle. Indeed, your goal at this point would be to minimize your engagement with the officer, as everything the officer sees, smells, and hears will be used against you.
Secondly, in almost every circumstance, if you have had more than two drinks over a short amount of time, it would be advisable to not take the field sobriety tests. The following articulates the reasons as to why this is a sound idea:
(1) Everything observed will be used against you. When you submit to field sobriety tests every mis-step, every stuttered letter, and everything you say or do not say will be used against you at trial. Why help the Commonwealth build their case against you?
(2) Your chances of passing the tests after having a drink or two are slim. Sober people do not pass all of the sobriety tests. You are nervous. It could be dark. The road could be slanted or skewed. There is traffic passing you. There are people watching you. Even sober people – who have had nothing to drink – do not pass field sobriety tests. Therefore, do not submit to the tests because you think you are going to pass. Indeed, if I am asked to take a field sobriety test, I will not do it. If a police officer is asking you to take a field sobriety test he is already inclined to arrest you and charge you with OUI.
(3) You have no obligation to submit to the Field Sobriety Tests — But the police do not need to tell you this. When someone is asked to step out of their motor vehicle by a police officer, many scary things will be running through your head. Indeed, your livelihood, your family’s well-being could all be on the line. The police officer WILL intimidate you. The police officer will make you feel that you have no choice but to take the filed sobriety tests. However, what he does not have to tell you — and trust me, he won’t tell you — is that YOU DO NOT HAVE TO TAKE FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS. You have a Constitutional Right not to incriminate yourself. Use your rights!
(4) No evidence, no case. The burden of proof in a criminal case falls squarely on the shoulders of the Commonwealth. You never have to prove a thing. You do not need to prove that you were not drinking. Rather, the Commonwealth must prove that you were operating your motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. How does the Commonwealth prove that you were drunk? They do this by observations of police officers and witnesses. They do this by watching you submit to field sobriety tests, and they do this by the breath test results. If you do not submit to the field sobriety tests, and you do not take the breath test, the only thing the Commonwealth will have in their case-in-chief is the observations made by any witnesses that may have observed your driving, and the testimony of the police officer who pulled you over. While there are never any guarantees, the Commonwealth would be hard-pressed to prove BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT that you were driving under the influence with such little evidence. Play the game, they want to win, don’t give them the cards to do so.